⭐️SOLD⭐️GUCCI Coated Canvas Large Carry Duffle Bag

Name: ⭐️SOLD⭐️GUCCI Coated Canvas Large Carry Duffle Bag
Brand: Gucci
SKU: 5c88f1397386bc5bec7bcb1f
Price: 975.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Gucci

US$975 US$1,450

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $243.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Excellent Condition.......💯% Authentic! Designer: Gucci Material: Beige/blue GG plus coated canvas with navy blue leather Includes: padlock, clochette with two keys Origin: Italy Date Code: 206500 213048 Measurements: ( Approx ) 20.5" L x 10.25" W x 10.5"H Handles: Double rolled navy blue leather top handles and a removable, adjustable comfort shoulder pad Handle Drop: 4.5" and 18" adjustable 1 Interior flat pocket Hardware: Silvertone ❌NO TRADES❌ ⭐️REASONABLE OFFERS ONLY PLEASE⭐️

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Ships to: United States
~~$7.97~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

13sales13 and 28 others like this

5 Comments

pmeier6 Will this be authenticated by Poshmark?

Mar 21Reply

dmalec55 @pmeier6 hi yes of course

Mar 21Reply

aimssc ♥️ 💜 ❤️

Mar 22Reply

dmalec55 @aimssc I love this too, kinda thinking I should keep it........hope you feel a little better knowing the monster he/she losers closet got taken down. I know why too..because that black Gucci Tote bag that she had up and then sold for $999 she didn’t have because once again she stole someone else’s photos for that listing and no love note or comments from the buyer???? Someone that buys something like that will at least comment or have some communication

Mar 22Reply

aimssc @dmalec55 It is a gorgeous bag! It is definitely a keeper! She probably messed with the wrong person. Digital Karma! She deserves it and more! I wonder if her boyfriend still feel he is the luckiest person and has the most beautiful girl! I wanna barf 🤮. He has no idea what he is getting into. Just trouble. Hope she’ll rot in jail with my Fendi back pack by her side. Hahaha! #RealTalk

Mar 22Reply