Vintage Roevelle 100% Silk Bomber Jacket Mens Large L Tan Lined Lightweight Zip
US$52
Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $13 with Learn more
- Size
- US L
- Condition
- Good
- Color
- Tan
- Category
- MenJackets & Coats
- Brand
- ROEVELLE
- Style Tags
- VintageSilkLightweight
Vintage Roevelle 100% Silk Bomber Jacket Mens Large L Tan Lined Lightweight Zip
Condition: Pre-owned - Good - Pre-owned jacket with light overall wear to the silk shell and lining. Elastic at hem is stretched out. Small fabric snag on front near button placket. Pocket openings are partly sewn closed as shown.
This is a mix between a very lightly insulated bomber jacket and a slightly puffy windbreaker.
Size: Mens Large (L).
Material: Shell 100% silk, lining 100% silk; lightly padded interior; made in China; RN 67332; dry clean recommended.
- Tan satin-finish silk shell with black vertical stripe trim front and back.
- Stand-up collar with button tab and full front zipper with button placket overlay.
- Elasticized hem and button cuffs for a relaxed bomber silhouette.
- Quilted silk lining with light insulation for added warmth.
Actual Measurements: Chest: 26 in pit to pit, Length: 28.5 in, Arm Length: 21 in.
Keywords: bomber jacket, shacket style, minimalist, streetwear, casual, smart casual, fall, winter, layering piece, neutral tan, soft silk, relaxed fit, 90s inspired, normcore, elevated basic, vintage
Like To Get Deals!

Trust & Shipping
Posh Protect (Included)
Get a refund if your order never ships or is not as described.
Shipping
$6.49
Other Jackets & Coats you may like
People Also Searched
Trending Now
Account is under Review
Comment posting is temporarily restricted. Our team will reach out to you shortly. To understand why, select
Learn More.
Still Selling This?
Yes, this item is still for sale.
I don’t want to sell this item right now.
I no longer have this item.
Delete Listing?
This action cannot be undone. You will no longer see this listing in your closet and your account will not be affected.

















































































Comments