sunnyarizona888

Updated Dec 18

Vans Classic Slip-On Skate Shoes Women's Blur Chec

Name: Vans Classic Slip-On Skate Shoes Women's Blur Chec
Brand: Vans
SKU: 5d4b3064c2835ce1fedde2f4
Price: 64.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

NWT

Vans

US$64

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $16 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

NEW IN OPEN TOP BOX (sizes 6.5 &9.5) AUTHENTIC Vans Classic Slip On Shoes SIZE WOMEN'S COLOR: Blur Check/Black/Classic White Product Details Vans Classic Slip-On has a low profile, slip-on canvas upper with all-over checker print, elastic side accents, Vans flag label and Vans original Waffle Outsole. Imported.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
Ships to: United States
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

tallytara13 and 326 others like this

18 Comments

itskaylaprice I have a new brand new pair of grey vans size 8.5 would you be willing to trade?

Aug 08Reply

sunnyarizona888 @itskaylaprice no thanks

Aug 08Reply

popopo321 30?

Aug 09Reply

juhswantcloths can i get this for $49

Aug 13Reply

thegirlkk @aidemargarita

Aug 15Reply

aidemargarita @thegirlkk ooooo i like These i might get it

Aug 15Reply

thegirlkk @aidemargarita lol ok 😂❤️

Aug 15Reply

aidemargarita @thegirlkk haha 🤣

Aug 15Reply

treverdoubt Will you take $45.00

Aug 21Reply

wesnquinnmelvin Trade?

Aug 21Reply

sunnyarizona888 @wesnquinnmelvin no thanks

Aug 21Reply

shannachap Will you take 50

Sep 18Reply

queenshorty22 $10

Sep 28Reply

raelyn79 Is the 7.5 women’s gone?

Oct 14Reply

sunnyarizona888 @raelyn79 yes

Oct 14Reply

raelyn79 @sunnyarizona888 i wear 7.5/8 would these be too small or fit good? I feel line vans in big ??

Oct 15Reply

sunnyarizona888 @raelyn79 i don't know every feet is different, please try some in store before buying.

Oct 15Reply

reflexinc @sunnyarizona888 hi ya- SO sorry, i’m .39 cents short- would u be able to lower price to 58 and i’ll buy them right away? i think i’ll get lower shipping and it’ll go through then, if that’s correct? thanks! sorry for the trouble.

Dec 12Reply