closetsos

Updated 9 hours ago

EUC VINTAGE GUCCI BUNDLE OF MATCHING BAG AND WALLET

Name: EUC VINTAGE GUCCI BUNDLE OF MATCHING BAG AND WALLET
Brand: Gucci
SKU: 647a0ae35d686b59da75153e
Price: 832.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Gucci

US$832 US$4,999

Free Shipping

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $208 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Gorgeous monogram GG canvas with turquoise textured patent leather trimming Bag has already been authenticated by TRR. Authentic Gucci Dustbag included with wallet In amazing condition. No rips, tears, odors or stains Get this set, you need it! These girls were separated for years and finally found each other again. They need a new home that will love them. I will accept serious offers View all photos carefully No accidental bids, failed payments or returns

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 15% off 3+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 10%
Ships to: United States
~~$7.97~~ FREE Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on orders over $500!
FREE authentication on items over $500!

sarahfalkoff and 49 others like this

4 Comments

osckarlatiefj Your store has really caught my eye, and I'm considering a larger purchase. Is there any chance of a discount? You can find my contact information on my profile. Thanks a bunch!

Aug 19Reply

thriftjunkie76 Hi love, is it the lighting or is some of the canvas blurry? In some of the photos the signature logos look very distorted/blurry but I’m not sure if it’s lighting or from wear?

Sep 30Reply

closetsos @thriftjunkie76 Thank you for asking! Great question. It is the lighting. The canvas has a reflective sheen on the monogram stitching so it looks different depending on the angle the light hits it. The canvas is in excellent condition on both pieces!

Oct 01Reply

closetsos @osckarlatiefj Of course! If you create a bundle of three or more items, you will receive a 15% discount and I can probably work with you a little more depending on the items. Thank you for your interest. I’m sorry I just saw this or I would have replied sooner!

Oct 01Reply