KAVU Women's Pocatello Corduroy Overalls Small

Name: KAVU Women's Pocatello Corduroy Overalls Small
Brand: Kavu
SKU: 67631b6c07ac55a1ffe197f9
Price: 80.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Kavu

US$80 US$150

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $20 with . Learn More .

Size

This item is sold

Like and save for later

Worn Once KAVU Women's Pocatello Corduroy Overalls in size Small: Waist: 27"–28" (68–71 cm) Hip: 36"–37" (91–94 cm) Inseam: Approx. 30" (76 cm) These overalls have a relaxed, comfortable fit with a slightly looser feel around the waist and hips. The corduroy material has some give, so they're not too stiff. If you're looking for a more fitted look, the Small should work perfectly.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 5% off 7+ Bundle
Ships to: United States
$6.49 Shipping

kburgin109 and 64 others like this

6 Comments

theshrugco What size are these? Or do you have a waist measurement?

Jan 27Reply

happycamperlo @theshrugco they’re a size small

Jan 27Reply

karisk1 @happycamperlo Are they a loose or tighter fit?

Sep 04Reply

msjust Hi, I would love to know the inseam measurement and how wide they are across. Thanks!

Sep 06Reply

happycamperlo @karisk1 Hi! Here are the measurements for the KAVU Women's Pocatello Corduroy Overalls in size Small: Waist: 27"–28" (68–71 cm) Hip: 36"–37" (91–94 cm) Inseam: Approx. 30" (76 cm) These overalls have a relaxed, comfortable fit with a slightly looser feel around the waist and hips. The corduroy material has some give, so they're not too stiff. If you're looking for a more fitted look, the Small should work perfectly.

Sep 12Reply

happycamperlo @msjust Hi! Here are the measurements for the KAVU Women's Pocatello Corduroy Overalls in size Small: Waist: 27"–28" (68–71 cm) Hip: 36"–37" (91–94 cm) Inseam: Approx. 30" (76 cm) These overalls have a relaxed, comfortable fit with a slightly looser feel around the waist and hips. The corduroy material has some give, so they're not too stiff. If you're looking for a more fitted look, the Small should work perfectly.

Sep 12Reply