laurlaurp

Updated Jun 10

COPY- authentic 90’s vintage wide leg jeans -size 25

Name: COPY- authentic 90’s vintage wide leg jeans -size 25
Brand: bleans
SKU: 61ba2068ffba948d9182463f
Price: 19.0 CAD
Availability: InStock

bleans

C$19 C$100

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Bleans 90’s wide leg jeans in excellent vintage condition. A few small marks and some rough spots on the hem but all together these are just beautiful. They are too long for me. Measurements in pics.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 15% off 3+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 24%
C$12.49 Expedited (1-7 day) Shipping on all orders

actuallykale and 9 others like this

8 Comments

laurlaurp @gan123 hey! Thanks for the offer:) $10 is too low but I can do $30 w/ 9.99 shipping -which is lower than my counteroffer. Lemme know;)

Jan 03Reply

ltaylor2721 The picture with 33” almost 34” — is that the inseam or is it measuring from the top of the jeans?

Jan 30Reply

laurlaurp @ltaylor2721 hi! That is the inseam measurement;)

Jan 31Reply

juliedagga Hi! Is it possible to post a pic of the material tag please?

Aug 16Reply

laurlaurp @juliedagga hey! Sorry I’m not home until Friday but I will take the pic of the tag then:)

Aug 17Reply

madelinelush I missed the offer😭

Jun 25Reply

makasarholz These are FANTASTIC! I can relate because I found a similar pair of flares (no pocket) in a dark denim at a thrift store 8 years ago and paid even more! Jeans never go out of style (bootcut, wide leg, straight leg, bellbottoms, skinny, boyfriend, mom, etc.) The only jean type I loathe is the 'low-cut hipsters' - no woman should wear those, even if you have the body of Naomi Campbell!!!

Oct 14Reply

laurlaurp If I (still) wore heels more often then these would 'puddle' nicely with them. However, I am usually wearing flats and these are just too long long on me (5 2") The jeans wear me. I can't go to work with them dragging on the ground. Lol I paid waaaay more for these (too). I had visions of me wearing them with heels daily. Never happned. Lol

Oct 14Reply