posh_patsy

Updated Apr 23

UNISEX RALPH LAUREN KHAKI FIELD JACKET MEDIUM VVGUC

Name: UNISEX RALPH LAUREN KHAKI FIELD JACKET MEDIUM VVGUC
Brand: Ralph Lauren
SKU: 6150d028284e99cd2f1cbd55
Price: 40.0 CAD
Availability: InStock

Ralph Lauren

C$40

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

This 100% Cotton Jacket By Ralph Lauren Is Adorned With An Embroidered Back, And Features A Full Zip (Works Up Or Down) Concealed Under A Placket, A Buttoned Closure (One Button Missing), Four Flap Pockets And A Drawstring Waist. Size Is Medium. Please Check Measurements In Photos. Excellent Condition Except For The Missing Button! (Could Be Exchanged With A Less Obvious Button Where Required). Colour On Mannequin Is Accurate. FRESHLY DRY CLEANED!!

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 5% off 5+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 27%
C$12.49 Expedited (1-7 day) Shipping on all orders

brogy14 and 4 others like this

6 Comments

g2spectre Would you be able to share closer pics of the back embroidery so that I can see it more clearly? And are you sure this is a men's jacket?

Nov 08Reply

posh_patsy @g2spectre Actually, I thought it was a ladies jacket so I listed it as such. Now I see the buttons are done up like a mans garment…. so I changed the listing. Let me know if you still would like extra photos and I can get those for you tomorrow. Thanks.

Nov 09Reply

g2spectre @posh_patsy I'd definitely like to see extra photos please. Thx in advance

Nov 09Reply

posh_patsy @g2spectre I have added two more photos. You can magnify your our screen images to get a closer look.

Nov 09Reply

g2spectre Thx for the added photos. I'm just not sure this is a man's garment; and there is no identification number in your pictures or description that can help me google this item to hopefully find other postings online to figure out the gender/body type it was originally designed for. Is there any model/identification number on this garment (on any of the tags or otherwise)?

Nov 11Reply

posh_patsy @g2spectre Hi, I don’t blame you for your scepticism… I don’t have any information other than what I posted originally. Sorry,

Nov 11Reply